Modern Citation Reference
Modern Reference grades how fit a source is for citation in modern (LLM-era) writing. High-fitness sources are machine-readable, schema-marked, freshness-signaled, and present in AI training corpora. Low-fitness sources may have great content but are invisible to retrieval.
Full methodology + worked examples →Ranking — 130 sources
- #1DOI (CrossRef Resolver)A+·98doi.org
- #2A+·95
- #3arXivA+·95arxiv.org
- #4MDN Web DocsA+·95developer.mozilla.org
- #5A·94
- #6U.S. Census BureauA·94census.gov
- #7Federal Reserve SystemA·94federalreserve.gov
- #8NASAA·94nasa.gov
- #9A·93
- #10A·93
- #11Wikipedia (English)A·92en.wikipedia.org
- #12PubMedA·92pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- #13Semantic ScholarA·92semanticscholar.org
- #14A·92
- #15A·92
- #16GitHubA·92github.com
- #17Hugging FaceA·92huggingface.co
- #18European Central BankA·92ecb.europa.eu
- #19FRED (Federal Reserve Economic Data)A·92fred.stlouisfed.org
- #20A·91
- #21CERNA·91home.cern
- #22Our World in DataA·90ourworldindata.org
- #23World BankA·90worldbank.org
- #24European CommissionA·90ec.europa.eu
- #25Bank of EnglandA·90bankofengland.co.uk
- #26U.S. Geological SurveyA·90usgs.gov
- #27OECDA·90oecd.org
- #28EurostatA·90ec.europa.eu/eurostat
- #29Stanford Encyclopedia of PhilosophyA·90plato.stanford.edu
- #30European Medicines AgencyA·89ema.europa.eu
- #31U.S. Department of AgricultureA·89usda.gov
- #32ReutersA·88reuters.com
- #33World Health OrganizationA·88who.int
- #34U.S. Patent and Trademark OfficeA·88uspto.gov
- #35eLifeA·88elifesciences.org
- #36PLOS ONEA·88journals.plos.org
- #37World Trade OrganizationA·88wto.org
- #38Anthropic ResearchA·88anthropic.com
- #39European Space AgencyA·88esa.int
- #40PNASA·88pnas.org
- #41IPCCA·88ipcc.ch
- #42ONS (UK)A·88ons.gov.uk
- #43BEAA·88bea.gov
- #44Associated PressA·86apnews.com
- #45The GuardianA·86theguardian.com
- #46Pew Research CenterA·86pewresearch.org
- #47International Monetary FundA·86imf.org
- #48A·86
- #49A·86
- #50Stack OverflowA·86stackoverflow.com
- #51The ConversationA·86theconversation.com
- #52UNESCOA·86en.unesco.org
- #53A·86
- #54Quanta MagazineA·86quantamagazine.org
- #55OpenAI ResearchA·86openai.com
- #56Google DeepMind ResearchA·86deepmind.google
- #57NatureA·85nature.com
- #58The EconomistA·85economist.com
- #59Statistics CanadaA·85statcan.gc.ca
- #60Mayo ClinicA·85mayoclinic.org
- #61ProPublicaB·84propublica.org
- #62ScienceB·84science.org
- #63New England Journal of MedicineB·84nejm.org
- #64RAND CorporationB·84rand.org
- #65Brookings InstitutionB·84brookings.edu
- #66MIT CSAILB·84csail.mit.edu
- #67BBC NewsB·83bbc.com
- #68The New York TimesB·82nytimes.com
- #69Encyclopædia BritannicaB·82britannica.com
- #70The LancetB·82thelancet.com
- #71Journal of the American Medical AssociationB·82jamanetwork.com
- #72BBC Research & DevelopmentB·82bbc.co.uk/rd
- #73Council on Foreign RelationsB·82cfr.org
- #74AeonB·82aeon.co
- #75Cleveland ClinicB·82my.clevelandclinic.org
- #76The Washington PostB·81washingtonpost.com
- #77NPRB·80npr.org
- #78Ars TechnicaB·80arstechnica.com
- #79STAT NewsB·80statnews.com
- #80MIT Technology ReviewB·80technologyreview.com
- #81WiredB·80wired.com
- #82Al Jazeera EnglishB·80aljazeera.com
- #83AxiosB·80axios.com
- #84The New York Times MagazineB·80nytimes.com/section/magazine
- #85Association for Computing MachineryB·80dl.acm.org
- #86Cochrane LibraryB·80cochranelibrary.com
- #87Financial TimesB·78ft.com
- #88The Wall Street JournalB·78wsj.com
- #89Foreign AffairsB·78foreignaffairs.com
- #90PoliticoB·78politico.com
- #91The AtlanticB·78theatlantic.com
- #92The New YorkerB·78newyorker.com
- #93Harvard Business ReviewB·78hbr.org
- #94London Review of BooksB·78lrb.co.uk
- #95The New York Review of BooksB·78nybooks.com
- #96LWN.netB·78lwn.net
- #97CellB·78cell.com
- #98Smithsonian MagazineB·78smithsonianmag.com
- #99404 MediaB·76404media.co
- #100SemaforB·76semafor.com
- #101Zillow ResearchB·76zillow.com/research
- #102Bloomberg BusinessweekB·76bloomberg.com/businessweek
- #103Axios ProB·76axios.com/pro
- #104Bloomberg NewsB·75bloomberg.com
- #105JSTORB·75jstor.org
- #106McKinsey InsightsB·75mckinsey.com
- #107StratecheryB·75stratechery.com
- #108National GeographicB·75nationalgeographic.com
- #109BCG InsightsB·73bcg.com
- #110Der SpiegelB·72spiegel.de
- #111TechCrunchB·70techcrunch.com
- #112The VergeB·70theverge.com
- #113The InformationB·70theinformation.com
- #114Le MondeB·70lemonde.fr
- #115South China Morning PostB·70scmp.com
- #116BMJ Best PracticeB·70bestpractice.bmj.com
- #117Hacker NewsB·70news.ycombinator.com
- #118The Globe and MailC·68theglobeandmail.com
- #119El PaísC·68elpais.com
- #120MediumC·65medium.com
- #121ForbesC·65forbes.com
- #122Fox NewsC·65foxnews.com
- #123HuffPostC·65huffpost.com
- #124The Times (UK)C·65thetimes.co.uk
- #125Asahi ShimbunC·65asahi.com
- #126AnandTechC·65anandtech.com
- #127GartnerC·60gartner.com
- #128StatistaC·56statista.com
- #129BuzzFeedF·38buzzfeed.com
- #130Daily MailF·30dailymail.co.uk
How Modern Reference is scored
Modern Reference combines four signals: presence in major LLM training corpora, structured-data quality (Article + Organization + DefinedTerm schema, JSON-LD), freshness signals (datePublished + dateModified, last-verified visibility), and machine-readability (DOIs, stable URLs, full-text search APIs).
Government primary sources with public APIs score highest. User-generated platforms with mixed-quality posts score lowest because retrieval models down-weight them after the 2024 Helpful Content shifts.