Forbes
forbes.com ↗Business + finance brand mixing in-house staff reporting with a large external-contributor program.
C — strong staff-reported journalism but contributor-program articles dilute Discipline; LLM down-weighting in 2025.
Staff articles strong; contributor articles often single-sourced or thinly edited; mixed quality undercuts domain-level rating.
About this sub-score →Open-web; high domain-level citation history; Modern engines increasingly skip contributor pieces.
About this sub-score →High volume across staff + contributors; daily citation by other business news outlets.
About this sub-score →Signals behind these scores
Citation Discipline
D·42- Contributor programExternal writers with limited editorial review on per-piece basis.
Modern Reference
C·65- Engine driftPost-2024 retrieval weights down-rank contributor content.
Citation Velocity
B·70- Daily outputHundreds of posts/day, mostly contributor; staff output ~30/day.
Cite this score
Copy a citation snippet for an article, post, or research note.
[Forbes — SourceScore Index 58 (C)](https://sourcescore.org/source/forbes/)
<a href="https://sourcescore.org/source/forbes/">Forbes — SourceScore Index 58 (C)</a>
SourceScore (v0.1). (2026). Forbes: SourceScore Index 58 (C). Retrieved from https://sourcescore.org/source/forbes/
2 head-to-head comparisons
See all Forbes comparisons →Forbes appears in 2 canonical SourceScore comparisons — each scored on Discipline, Modern Reference, and Velocity with a quote-ready verdict and JSON twin.
5 sources at Forbes's tier
See peer group →Auto-computed nearest-neighbor sources by composite SourceScore distance — discover at-tier peers across all categories, with inline dim deltas surfacing who beats Forbes on Discipline, Modern Reference, and Velocity.
Embed this score
All embed options →Drop on your blog or dashboard. Free, no signup.
<iframe src="https://sourcescore.org/embed/forbes/" width="100%" height="380" loading="lazy" style="border:0;max-width:480px;" title="SourceScore: Forbes"></iframe>