Citation Discipline Score
Citation Discipline measures how rigorously a source backs each factual claim with a verifiable external source. High-discipline sources cite primary evidence inline; low-discipline sources opine without sourcing. AI engines weigh discipline heavily — uncited claims are increasingly skipped by retrieval models.
Full methodology + worked examples →Ranking — 130 sources
- #1A+·98
- #2Wikipedia (English)A+·96en.wikipedia.org
- #3PubMedA+·96pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- #4New England Journal of MedicineA+·96nejm.org
- #5A+·96
- #6Federal Reserve SystemA+·96federalreserve.gov
- #7CERNA+·96home.cern
- #8Association for Computing MachineryA+·96dl.acm.org
- #9PNASA+·96pnas.org
- #10CellA+·96cell.com
- #11Cochrane LibraryA+·96cochranelibrary.com
- #12Stanford Encyclopedia of PhilosophyA+·96plato.stanford.edu
- #13NatureA+·95nature.com
- #14A+·95
- #15ProPublicaA+·95propublica.org
- #16ScienceA+·95science.org
- #17U.S. Census BureauA+·95census.gov
- #18A+·95
- #19The LancetA+·95thelancet.com
- #20A+·95
- #21A+·95
- #22U.S. Patent and Trademark OfficeA+·95uspto.gov
- #23Journal of the American Medical AssociationA+·95jamanetwork.com
- #24European Central BankA+·95ecb.europa.eu
- #25U.S. Geological SurveyA+·95usgs.gov
- #26IPCCA+·95ipcc.ch
- #27European Medicines AgencyA·94ema.europa.eu
- #28European CommissionA·94ec.europa.eu
- #29Bank of EnglandA·94bankofengland.co.uk
- #30U.S. Department of AgricultureA·94usda.gov
- #31A·94
- #32NASAA·94nasa.gov
- #33FRED (Federal Reserve Economic Data)A·94fred.stlouisfed.org
- #34OECDA·93oecd.org
- #35Encyclopædia BritannicaA·92britannica.com
- #36DOI (CrossRef Resolver)A·92doi.org
- #37Foreign AffairsA·92foreignaffairs.com
- #38Our World in DataA·92ourworldindata.org
- #39Pew Research CenterA·92pewresearch.org
- #40A·92
- #41World Trade OrganizationA·92wto.org
- #42A·92
- #43European Space AgencyA·92esa.int
- #44ONS (UK)A·92ons.gov.uk
- #45EurostatA·92ec.europa.eu/eurostat
- #46BEAA·92bea.gov
- #47BMJ Best PracticeA·92bestpractice.bmj.com
- #48MDN Web DocsA·92developer.mozilla.org
- #49ReutersA·91reuters.com
- #50World Health OrganizationA·90who.int
- #51World BankA·90worldbank.org
- #52International Monetary FundA·90imf.org
- #53eLifeA·90elifesciences.org
- #54The New YorkerA·90newyorker.com
- #55The New York Times MagazineA·90nytimes.com/section/magazine
- #56RAND CorporationA·90rand.org
- #57A·90
- #58UNESCOA·90en.unesco.org
- #59Quanta MagazineA·90quantamagazine.org
- #60London Review of BooksA·90lrb.co.uk
- #61The New York Review of BooksA·90nybooks.com
- #62MIT CSAILA·90csail.mit.edu
- #63LWN.netA·90lwn.net
- #64JSTORA·90jstor.org
- #65Statistics CanadaA·90statcan.gc.ca
- #66Associated PressA·89apnews.com
- #67The New York TimesA·88nytimes.com
- #68Financial TimesA·88ft.com
- #69The Wall Street JournalA·88wsj.com
- #70STAT NewsA·88statnews.com
- #71404 MediaA·88404media.co
- #72The InformationA·88theinformation.com
- #73The ConversationA·88theconversation.com
- #74Brookings InstitutionA·88brookings.edu
- #75Council on Foreign RelationsA·88cfr.org
- #76Google DeepMind ResearchA·88deepmind.google
- #77Mayo ClinicA·88mayoclinic.org
- #78The Washington PostA·87washingtonpost.com
- #79Bloomberg NewsA·86bloomberg.com
- #80Semantic ScholarA·86semanticscholar.org
- #81MIT Technology ReviewA·86technologyreview.com
- #82SemaforA·86semafor.com
- #83The AtlanticA·86theatlantic.com
- #84Harvard Business ReviewA·86hbr.org
- #85Bloomberg BusinessweekA·86bloomberg.com/businessweek
- #86Anthropic ResearchA·86anthropic.com
- #87Cleveland ClinicA·86my.clevelandclinic.org
- #88The GuardianA·85theguardian.com
- #89Der SpiegelA·85spiegel.de
- #90NPRB·84npr.org
- #91PLOS ONEB·84journals.plos.org
- #92BBC Research & DevelopmentB·84bbc.co.uk/rd
- #93AeonB·84aeon.co
- #94Le MondeB·84lemonde.fr
- #95Axios ProB·82axios.com/pro
- #96The Times (UK)B·82thetimes.co.uk
- #97The Globe and MailB·82theglobeandmail.com
- #98National GeographicB·82nationalgeographic.com
- #99BBC NewsB·80bbc.com
- #100PoliticoB·80politico.com
- #101AxiosB·80axios.com
- #102Zillow ResearchB·80zillow.com/research
- #103Hugging FaceB·80huggingface.co
- #104OpenAI ResearchB·80openai.com
- #105Asahi ShimbunB·80asahi.com
- #106El PaísB·80elpais.com
- #107Smithsonian MagazineB·80smithsonianmag.com
- #108arXivB·78arxiv.org
- #109Ars TechnicaB·78arstechnica.com
- #110WiredB·78wired.com
- #111Al Jazeera EnglishB·78aljazeera.com
- #112GitHubB·78github.com
- #113South China Morning PostB·78scmp.com
- #114AnandTechB·75anandtech.com
- #115The EconomistB·71economist.com
- #116StatistaB·70statista.com
- #117Stack OverflowB·70stackoverflow.com
- #118McKinsey InsightsB·70mckinsey.com
- #119BCG InsightsB·70bcg.com
- #120GartnerC·65gartner.com
- #121StratecheryC·65stratechery.com
- #122The VergeC·55theverge.com
- #123TechCrunchD·50techcrunch.com
- #124Fox NewsD·50foxnews.com
- #125HuffPostD·50huffpost.com
- #126Hacker NewsD·50news.ycombinator.com
- #127ForbesD·42forbes.com
- #128MediumD·40medium.com
- #129BuzzFeedF·30buzzfeed.com
- #130Daily MailF·22dailymail.co.uk
How Discipline is scored
A source earns a high Discipline score by demonstrating consistent inline citation, public corrections processes, dual-source verification policies, and (where applicable) peer review. Government primary sources and peer-reviewed journals score highest because discipline is enforced by law or by editorial process.
Lower Discipline scores apply to platforms that mix professional + amateur authorship without a per-piece citation requirement, or to formats (listicles, quizzes) where evidence is structurally absent.