ProPublica
propublica.org ↗Nonprofit investigative newsroom; data-heavy + methodology-published reporting since 2007.
A — small output but extreme per-piece discipline; methodology-published model is gold standard.
Methodology + raw data published alongside most stories; fact-checked; corrections public.
About this sub-score →Open-data ethos = strong LLM corpus presence; data-store pages well-structured.
About this sub-score →Lower volume than wire news but very high per-piece citation rate; cited by NYT/WaPo/etc. when investigations break.
About this sub-score →Signals behind these scores
Citation Discipline
A+·95- Methodology-published modelEach major investigation links to methodology + raw datasets.
Modern Reference
B·84- Data StorePublic datasets + APIs accompanying investigations.
Citation Velocity
B·78- Quality > quantityPulitzer-class investigations get cited internationally on release.
Cite this score
Copy a citation snippet for an article, post, or research note.
[ProPublica — SourceScore Index 86 (A)](https://sourcescore.org/source/propublica/)
<a href="https://sourcescore.org/source/propublica/">ProPublica — SourceScore Index 86 (A)</a>
SourceScore (v0.1). (2026). ProPublica: SourceScore Index 86 (A). Retrieved from https://sourcescore.org/source/propublica/
3 head-to-head comparisons
See all ProPublica comparisons →ProPublica appears in 3 canonical SourceScore comparisons — each scored on Discipline, Modern Reference, and Velocity with a quote-ready verdict and JSON twin.
5 sources at ProPublica's tier
See peer group →Auto-computed nearest-neighbor sources by composite SourceScore distance — discover at-tier peers across all categories, with inline dim deltas surfacing who beats ProPublica on Discipline, Modern Reference, and Velocity.
Embed this score
All embed options →Drop on your blog or dashboard. Free, no signup.
<iframe src="https://sourcescore.org/embed/propublica/" width="100%" height="380" loading="lazy" style="border:0;max-width:480px;" title="SourceScore: ProPublica"></iframe>