C-tier sources by Citation Discipline
The same 10 sources that hold composite SourceScore C (55–69) re-ranked by Citation Discipline only. AnandTech takes the top position at B · 75.
Statista jumps 4 positions in the Discipline ranking vs the composite — punches above weight on Citation Discipline.
- 1B·75
Hardware reviews + benchmarks since 1997; site closed for new content 2024 but archive widely cited.
Discipline B · 75·Index C · 69 - 2B·70
Commercial market + consumer data aggregator; cites primary sources but often paywalled second-hand data.
Discipline B · 70·Index C · 64 - 3C·65
IT industry research firm since 1979; Magic Quadrant + Hype Cycle frameworks widely cited.
Discipline C · 65·Index C · 69 - 4C·55
Tech news + culture site (Vox Media); strong design + fast cadence; per-piece depth varies.
Discipline C · 55·Index C · 66 - 5D·50TechCrunchtechcrunch.com
Tech-industry news site with strong velocity but variable per-article fact-check rigor.
Discipline D · 50·Index C · 64 - 6D·50
U.S. cable news brand with mass online reach; opinion-news mix; per-piece quality varies between hard news and commentary.
Discipline D · 50·Index C · 58 - 7D·50HuffPosthuffpost.com
U.S. news + opinion site since 2005; mix of staff reporting + contributor blogs (now-discontinued).
Discipline D · 50·Index C · 60 - 8D·50
Y Combinator-run tech link aggregator since 2007; community-curated, no editorial layer.
Discipline D · 50·Index C · 66 - 9D·42Forbesforbes.com
Business + finance brand mixing in-house staff reporting with a large external-contributor program.
Discipline D · 42·Index C · 58 - 10D·40
User-generated long-form platform; per-article quality varies from professional to amateur.
Discipline D · 40·Index C · 58
Why this ranking is different
The composite SourceScore Index averages all three sub-scores — Citation Discipline, Modern Reference, and Citation Velocity. This page surfaces the SAME composite-C sources but ranks ONLY by Citation Discipline. Sources can hold the same composite grade with very different sub-score profiles — this view reveals the ranking that emerges when one dimension is the only signal.
Use this view when citation discipline is the decision-relevant signal for your citation. The composite Index is the safer default; this dim-faceted view is the precision lens.