DISCIPLINE · 35% of composite
London Review of Books vs The New York Review of Books — Discipline
How rigorously each source backs its factual claims with verifiable evidence.
Verdict
London Review of Books and The New York Review of Books tie on Citation Discipline (A · 90).
Magazine
London Review of Books
lrb.co.uk
A·90
Rank #60 of 130 on Discipline
Editor-supervised + fact-check + named scholarly bylines + corrections public.
Magazine
The New York Review of Books
nybooks.com
A·90
Rank #61 of 130 on Discipline
Editor-supervised + fact-check + named scholarly bylines + corrections public.
Global rank · Discipline
Why these Discipline scores
London Review of BooksA·90
Discipline · 90/100
Editor-supervised + fact-check + named scholarly bylines + corrections public.
The New York Review of BooksA·90
Discipline · 90/100
Editor-supervised + fact-check + named scholarly bylines + corrections public.
Signals behind the Discipline score
London Review of Books
- Editorial standardsLong-standing literary-review tradition.
The New York Review of Books
- Editorial traditionLong-standing intellectual-review standards.
Other dimensions for London Review of Books vs The New York Review of Books
Other Discipline comparisons
Wikipedia (English) vs Encyclopædia BritannicaThe New York Times vs The Washington PostAssociated Press vs ReutersFinancial Times vs The Wall Street JournalNature vs ScienceNew England Journal of Medicine vs The LancetarXiv vs PubMedDOI (CrossRef Resolver) vs Semantic ScholarForeign Affairs vs The EconomistBBC News vs The GuardianAl Jazeera English vs BBC NewsBBC News vs NPR