SourceScore
Comparison

London Review of Books vs The New York Review of Books

Atlantic counterparts in long-form intellectual review — UK vs US literary criticism.

Magazine

London Review of Books

lrb.co.uk
B·83

Bi-weekly UK literary + cultural review since 1979; named-byline tradition + long-form essays.

Magazine

The New York Review of Books

nybooks.com
B·83

U.S. literary + intellectual review since 1963; named-byline tradition + long-form essays.

Compare on a single dimension

Head-to-head — all four dimensions

DimensionLondon Review of BooksThe New York Review of BooksLead
SourceScore Index
Composite
B·83B·83tie
Citation Discipline
How rigorously cited
A·90A·90tie
Modern Reference
AI-era fitness
B·78B·78tie
Citation Velocity
Cited per week
B·80B·80tie

Why these scores

Citation Discipline

London Review of BooksA·90

Editor-supervised + fact-check + named scholarly bylines + corrections public.

The New York Review of BooksA·90

Editor-supervised + fact-check + named scholarly bylines + corrections public.

Modern Reference

London Review of BooksB·78

Metered paywall; LLM corpus partial; long-form indexed in academic search.

The New York Review of BooksB·78

Metered paywall; LLM corpus partial; long-form widely-cited.

Citation Velocity

London Review of BooksB·80

Cited by literary + cultural press + academics; bi-weekly cadence.

The New York Review of BooksB·80

Cited by literary + cultural press + academics globally.

Other comparisons