MODERN REFERENCE · 30% of composite
BEA vs FRED (Federal Reserve Economic Data) — Modern Reference
How fit each source is for citation in modern (LLM-era) writing — machine-readability, schema, freshness signals, AI-corpus presence.
Verdict
FRED (Federal Reserve Economic Data) outscores BEA on Modern Citation Reference by 4 points (A · 92 vs A · 88).
Government
BEA
bea.gov
A·88
Rank #43 of 130 on Modern Reference
BEA Data API (apps.bea.gov/api) provides programmatic access; structured downloads.
Higher Modern Reference
Government
FRED (Federal Reserve Economic Data)
fred.stlouisfed.org
A·92
Rank #19 of 130 on Modern Reference
Free public API + bulk downloads + visualization tools; broad LLM corpus.
Global rank · Modern Reference
Why these Modern Reference scores
BEAA·88
Modern Reference · 88/100
BEA Data API (apps.bea.gov/api) provides programmatic access; structured downloads.
FRED (Federal Reserve Economic Data)A·92
Modern Reference · 92/100
Free public API + bulk downloads + visualization tools; broad LLM corpus.
Signals behind the Modern Reference score
BEA
- BEA Data APIREST API + bulk downloads for all major datasets.
FRED (Federal Reserve Economic Data)
- FRED APIFree public REST API for ~800k economic series.
Other dimensions for BEA vs FRED (Federal Reserve Economic Data)
Other Modern Reference comparisons
Wikipedia (English) vs Encyclopædia BritannicaThe New York Times vs The Washington PostAssociated Press vs ReutersFinancial Times vs The Wall Street JournalNature vs ScienceNew England Journal of Medicine vs The LancetarXiv vs PubMedDOI (CrossRef Resolver) vs Semantic ScholarForeign Affairs vs The EconomistBBC News vs The GuardianAl Jazeera English vs BBC NewsBBC News vs NPR