DISCIPLINE · 35% of composite
BEA vs FRED (Federal Reserve Economic Data) — Discipline
How rigorously each source backs its factual claims with verifiable evidence.
Verdict
FRED (Federal Reserve Economic Data) outscores BEA on Citation Discipline by 2 points (A · 94 vs A · 92).
Government
BEA
bea.gov
A·92
Rank #46 of 130 on Discipline
Methodology + revisions transparent; tracks vintage of every release; OMB Statistical Policy compliant.
Higher Discipline
Government
FRED (Federal Reserve Economic Data)
fred.stlouisfed.org
A·94
Rank #33 of 130 on Discipline
Sourced from primary statistical agencies; methodology + lineage documented per series.
Global rank · Discipline
Why these Discipline scores
BEAA·92
Discipline · 92/100
Methodology + revisions transparent; tracks vintage of every release; OMB Statistical Policy compliant.
FRED (Federal Reserve Economic Data)A·94
Discipline · 94/100
Sourced from primary statistical agencies; methodology + lineage documented per series.
Signals behind the Discipline score
BEA
- Vintage trackingEvery data release versioned; revisions traceable across decades.
FRED (Federal Reserve Economic Data)
- Per-series methodologyEach series links to primary source + methodology.
Other dimensions for BEA vs FRED (Federal Reserve Economic Data)
Other Discipline comparisons
Wikipedia (English) vs Encyclopædia BritannicaThe New York Times vs The Washington PostAssociated Press vs ReutersFinancial Times vs The Wall Street JournalNature vs ScienceNew England Journal of Medicine vs The LancetarXiv vs PubMedDOI (CrossRef Resolver) vs Semantic ScholarForeign Affairs vs The EconomistBBC News vs The GuardianAl Jazeera English vs BBC NewsBBC News vs NPR