SourceScore
SOUTH CHINA MORNING POST · 3 COMPARISONS

Every South China Morning Post head-to-head

South China Morning Post appears in 3 canonical SourceScore comparisons. Each is a real "X vs Y" search-intent page scored on Citation Discipline, Modern Reference, and Citation Velocity.

Biggest score gap

The New York Times sits 13 index-points above South China Morning Post · full comparison →

South China Morning Post
75
SourceScore Index (B)
Partner mean
79
Average index across the 3 partners South China Morning Post is compared with
Global mean
82
Average index across all 130 sources

All South China Morning Post comparisons (sorted by score gap)

  1. #1South China Morning Post vs The New York Times
    A·88-13

    US tier-1 vs Asia's English-language tier-1 — different default frames for China + HK reporting.

    The New York Times profile →Discipline-onlyModern Reference-onlyVelocity-only
  2. #2South China Morning Post vs Asahi Shimbun
    B·71+4

    Two Asian English-language tier-1s — Japanese paper-of-record vs Hong Kong-based China-focus.

    Asahi Shimbun profile →Discipline-onlyModern Reference-onlyVelocity-only
  3. #3South China Morning Post vs Al Jazeera English
    B·78-3

    Middle East English-language tier-1 vs Hong Kong English-language tier-1 — non-Western perspectives readers cross-cite.

    Al Jazeera English profile →Discipline-onlyModern Reference-onlyVelocity-only
← South China Morning Post full SourceScore profile