MODERN REFERENCE · 30% of composite
Nature vs PNAS — Modern Reference
How fit each source is for citation in modern (LLM-era) writing — machine-readability, schema, freshness signals, AI-corpus presence.
Verdict
PNAS outscores Nature on Modern Citation Reference by 3 points (A · 88 vs A · 85).
Academic
Nature
nature.com
A·85
Rank #57 of 130 on Modern Reference
DOIs are first-class citations in LLM training; abstracts well-indexed.
Higher Modern Reference
Academic
PNAS
pnas.org
A·88
Rank #40 of 130 on Modern Reference
DOI per paper; PMC open-access default after 6mo; structured Crossref + ORCID metadata.
Global rank · Modern Reference
Why these Modern Reference scores
NatureA·85
Modern Reference · 85/100
DOIs are first-class citations in LLM training; abstracts well-indexed.
PNASA·88
Modern Reference · 88/100
DOI per paper; PMC open-access default after 6mo; structured Crossref + ORCID metadata.
Signals behind the Modern Reference score
Nature
- DOIPermanent identifier per article; resolves at doi.org.
PNAS
- Open-access policyAll content open after 6-month embargo; many papers immediately open.
Other dimensions for Nature vs PNAS
Other Modern Reference comparisons
Wikipedia (English) vs Encyclopædia BritannicaThe New York Times vs The Washington PostAssociated Press vs ReutersFinancial Times vs The Wall Street JournalNature vs ScienceNew England Journal of Medicine vs The LancetarXiv vs PubMedDOI (CrossRef Resolver) vs Semantic ScholarForeign Affairs vs The EconomistBBC News vs The GuardianAl Jazeera English vs BBC NewsBBC News vs NPR