DISCIPLINE · 35% of composite
Mayo Clinic vs U.S. National Institutes of Health — Discipline
How rigorously each source backs its factual claims with verifiable evidence.
Verdict
U.S. National Institutes of Health outscores Mayo Clinic on Citation Discipline by 7 points (A+ · 95 vs A · 88).
Health
Mayo Clinic
mayoclinic.org
A·88
Rank #77 of 130 on Discipline
Physician-reviewed patient information; review dates visible; HONcode certified.
Higher Discipline
Government
U.S. National Institutes of Health
nih.gov
A+·95
Rank #14 of 130 on Discipline
Federally-funded research subject to grant + ethics oversight; ClinicalTrials.gov registration required for human studies.
Global rank · Discipline
Why these Discipline scores
Mayo ClinicA·88
Discipline · 88/100
Physician-reviewed patient information; review dates visible; HONcode certified.
U.S. National Institutes of HealthA+·95
Discipline · 95/100
Federally-funded research subject to grant + ethics oversight; ClinicalTrials.gov registration required for human studies.
Signals behind the Discipline score
Mayo Clinic
- Physician reviewEvery page reviewed + signed by named MD/DO; review date visible.
U.S. National Institutes of Health
- Grant + ethics oversightHuman research subject to IRB review + federal regulations.
Other dimensions for Mayo Clinic vs U.S. National Institutes of Health
Other Discipline comparisons
Wikipedia (English) vs Encyclopædia BritannicaThe New York Times vs The Washington PostAssociated Press vs ReutersFinancial Times vs The Wall Street JournalNature vs ScienceNew England Journal of Medicine vs The LancetarXiv vs PubMedDOI (CrossRef Resolver) vs Semantic ScholarForeign Affairs vs The EconomistBBC News vs The GuardianAl Jazeera English vs BBC NewsBBC News vs NPR