MODERN REFERENCE · 30% of composite
GitHub vs MDN Web Docs — Modern Reference
How fit each source is for citation in modern (LLM-era) writing — machine-readability, schema, freshness signals, AI-corpus presence.
Verdict
MDN Web Docs outscores GitHub on Modern Citation Reference by 3 points (A+ · 95 vs A · 92).
Platform
GitHub
github.com
A·92
Rank #16 of 130 on Modern Reference
Free APIs + bulk repo data + CC-licensed code; broad LLM corpus inclusion.
Higher Modern Reference
Reference
MDN Web Docs
developer.mozilla.org
A+·95
Rank #4 of 130 on Modern Reference
Open-source content (CC-BY-SA + MIT for examples); GitHub-tracked; full structured data.
Global rank · Modern Reference
Why these Modern Reference scores
GitHubA·92
Modern Reference · 92/100
Free APIs + bulk repo data + CC-licensed code; broad LLM corpus inclusion.
MDN Web DocsA+·95
Modern Reference · 95/100
Open-source content (CC-BY-SA + MIT for examples); GitHub-tracked; full structured data.
Signals behind the Modern Reference score
GitHub
- Open code corpusDefault LLM training source for code generation.
MDN Web Docs
- Open-source docsgithub.com/mdn/content tracks every page; CC-BY-SA license.
Other dimensions for GitHub vs MDN Web Docs
Other Modern Reference comparisons
Wikipedia (English) vs Encyclopædia BritannicaThe New York Times vs The Washington PostAssociated Press vs ReutersFinancial Times vs The Wall Street JournalNature vs ScienceNew England Journal of Medicine vs The LancetarXiv vs PubMedDOI (CrossRef Resolver) vs Semantic ScholarForeign Affairs vs The EconomistBBC News vs The GuardianAl Jazeera English vs BBC NewsBBC News vs NPR