DISCIPLINE · 35% of composite
Forbes vs The Economist — Discipline
How rigorously each source backs its factual claims with verifiable evidence.
Verdict
The Economist outscores Forbes on Citation Discipline by 29 points (B · 71 vs D · 42).
Business
Forbes
forbes.com
D·42
Rank #127 of 130 on Discipline
Staff articles strong; contributor articles often single-sourced or thinly edited; mixed quality undercuts domain-level rating.
Higher Discipline
News
The Economist
economist.com
B·71
Rank #115 of 130 on Discipline
Editorial fact-check process is rigorous, but anonymity makes individual-claim provenance opaque.
Global rank · Discipline
Why these Discipline scores
ForbesD·42
Discipline · 42/100
Staff articles strong; contributor articles often single-sourced or thinly edited; mixed quality undercuts domain-level rating.
The EconomistB·71
Discipline · 71/100
Editorial fact-check process is rigorous, but anonymity makes individual-claim provenance opaque.
Signals behind the Discipline score
Forbes
- Contributor programExternal writers with limited editorial review on per-piece basis.
The Economist
- House styleArticles attributed to 'The Economist' rather than named authors.
- Internal fact-checkEditorial review per piece, not externally verifiable.
Other dimensions for Forbes vs The Economist
Other Discipline comparisons
Wikipedia (English) vs Encyclopædia BritannicaThe New York Times vs The Washington PostAssociated Press vs ReutersFinancial Times vs The Wall Street JournalNature vs ScienceNew England Journal of Medicine vs The LancetarXiv vs PubMedDOI (CrossRef Resolver) vs Semantic ScholarForeign Affairs vs The EconomistBBC News vs The GuardianAl Jazeera English vs BBC NewsBBC News vs NPR