DISCIPLINE · 35% of composite
eLife vs PLOS ONE — Discipline
How rigorously each source backs its factual claims with verifiable evidence.
Verdict
eLife outscores PLOS ONE on Citation Discipline by 6 points (A · 90 vs B · 84).
Higher Discipline
Academic
eLife
elifesciences.org
A·90
Rank #53 of 130 on Discipline
Transparent peer-review (reviewer notes published); preprint-first model since 2022.
Academic
PLOS ONE
journals.plos.org
B·84
Rank #91 of 130 on Discipline
Peer-review checks methodology + ethics; novelty + significance left to readers; corrections public.
Global rank · Discipline
Why these Discipline scores
eLifeA·90
Discipline · 90/100
Transparent peer-review (reviewer notes published); preprint-first model since 2022.
PLOS ONEB·84
Discipline · 84/100
Peer-review checks methodology + ethics; novelty + significance left to readers; corrections public.
Signals behind the Discipline score
eLife
- Public peer reviewReviewer comments + author responses published with article.
PLOS ONE
- PLOS editorialMethodological-soundness model rather than novelty filter.
Other dimensions for eLife vs PLOS ONE
Other Discipline comparisons
Wikipedia (English) vs Encyclopædia BritannicaThe New York Times vs The Washington PostAssociated Press vs ReutersFinancial Times vs The Wall Street JournalNature vs ScienceNew England Journal of Medicine vs The LancetarXiv vs PubMedDOI (CrossRef Resolver) vs Semantic ScholarForeign Affairs vs The EconomistBBC News vs The GuardianAl Jazeera English vs BBC NewsBBC News vs NPR