DISCIPLINE · 35% of composite
Cell vs New England Journal of Medicine — Discipline
How rigorously each source backs its factual claims with verifiable evidence.
Verdict
Cell and New England Journal of Medicine tie on Citation Discipline (A+ · 96).
Academic
Cell
cell.com
A+·96
Rank #10 of 130 on Discipline
Rigorous peer review; high rejection rate; corrections + retractions public; methodology required.
Health
New England Journal of Medicine
nejm.org
A+·96
Rank #4 of 130 on Discipline
Rigorous peer-review; clinical-trial registration mandatory; data disclosure standards.
Global rank · Discipline
Why these Discipline scores
CellA+·96
Discipline · 96/100
Rigorous peer review; high rejection rate; corrections + retractions public; methodology required.
New England Journal of MedicineA+·96
Discipline · 96/100
Rigorous peer-review; clinical-trial registration mandatory; data disclosure standards.
Signals behind the Discipline score
Cell
- Peer-review rigorAmong the highest-rejection biology journals; multi-round review standard.
New England Journal of Medicine
- ICMJE complianceStrict International Committee of Medical Journal Editors standards.
Other dimensions for Cell vs New England Journal of Medicine
Other Discipline comparisons
Wikipedia (English) vs Encyclopædia BritannicaThe New York Times vs The Washington PostAssociated Press vs ReutersFinancial Times vs The Wall Street JournalNature vs ScienceNew England Journal of Medicine vs The LancetarXiv vs PubMedDOI (CrossRef Resolver) vs Semantic ScholarForeign Affairs vs The EconomistBBC News vs The GuardianAl Jazeera English vs BBC NewsBBC News vs NPR