DISCIPLINE · 35% of composite
Encyclopædia Britannica vs Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy — Discipline
How rigorously each source backs its factual claims with verifiable evidence.
Verdict
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy outscores Encyclopædia Britannica on Citation Discipline by 4 points (A+ · 96 vs A · 92).
Reference
Encyclopædia Britannica
britannica.com
A·92
Rank #35 of 130 on Discipline
Editor-supervised; named expert contributors; editorial-board fact-check; corrections logged.
Higher Discipline
Reference
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
plato.stanford.edu
A+·96
Rank #12 of 130 on Discipline
Every entry peer-reviewed by domain experts; updates tracked via versioning; bibliography per entry.
Global rank · Discipline
Why these Discipline scores
Encyclopædia BritannicaA·92
Discipline · 92/100
Editor-supervised; named expert contributors; editorial-board fact-check; corrections logged.
Stanford Encyclopedia of PhilosophyA+·96
Discipline · 96/100
Every entry peer-reviewed by domain experts; updates tracked via versioning; bibliography per entry.
Signals behind the Discipline score
Encyclopædia Britannica
- Editorial boardSubject-area editors review every entry.
- Named contributorsArticles signed by experts with credentials disclosed.
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
- Entry-level peer reviewEach article reviewed by editors + domain experts; updates versioned.
Other dimensions for Encyclopædia Britannica vs Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Other Discipline comparisons
Wikipedia (English) vs Encyclopædia BritannicaThe New York Times vs The Washington PostAssociated Press vs ReutersFinancial Times vs The Wall Street JournalNature vs ScienceNew England Journal of Medicine vs The LancetarXiv vs PubMedDOI (CrossRef Resolver) vs Semantic ScholarForeign Affairs vs The EconomistBBC News vs The GuardianAl Jazeera English vs BBC NewsBBC News vs NPR