SourceScore
Comparison

The BMJ (British Medical Journal) vs The Lancet

Two UK-based tier-1 general-medicine journals — both Elsevier-adjacent, scored head-to-head.

Health

The BMJ (British Medical Journal)

bmj.com
A·85

Peer-reviewed general medical journal; investigative + open-access leaning; UK-based since 1840.

Higher Index
Health

The Lancet

thelancet.com
A·86

Peer-reviewed general medical journal since 1823; flagship clinical-research publication.

Compare on a single dimension

Head-to-head — all four dimensions

DimensionThe BMJ (British Medical Journal)The LancetLead
SourceScore Index
Composite
A·85A·86The+1
Citation Discipline
How rigorously cited
A·92A+·95The+3
Modern Reference
AI-era fitness
A·86B·82The+4
Citation Velocity
Cited per week
B·78B·80The+2

Why these scores

Citation Discipline

The BMJ (British Medical Journal)A·92

Peer-review + open-data policy; corrections + retractions public; investigative-rigor standard.

The LancetA+·95

Peer-review enforced; methodology + data disclosure increasingly mandatory; retraction watch active.

Modern Reference

The BMJ (British Medical Journal)A·86

Open-access for many articles; structured DOIs + APIs; broad LLM corpus.

The LancetB·82

DOIs + structured abstracts; metered paywall partial-LLM-corpus.

Citation Velocity

The BMJ (British Medical Journal)B·78

Cited heavily within medical journalism + investigative health reporting.

The LancetB·80

Cited by clinicians + medical journalism; narrower volume than wire news but high per-cite trust.

Other comparisons