DISCIPLINE · 35% of composite
Ars Technica vs LWN.net — Discipline
How rigorously each source backs its factual claims with verifiable evidence.
Verdict
LWN.net outscores Ars Technica on Citation Discipline by 12 points (A · 90 vs B · 78).
Tech News
Ars Technica
arstechnica.com
B·78
Rank #109 of 130 on Discipline
Multi-source technical reporting; corrections public; named-author bylines + editorial accountability.
Higher Discipline
Tech News
LWN.net
lwn.net
A·90
Rank #63 of 130 on Discipline
Deep technical accuracy + named bylines + per-article rigor + corrections public.
Global rank · Discipline
Why these Discipline scores
Ars TechnicaB·78
Discipline · 78/100
Multi-source technical reporting; corrections public; named-author bylines + editorial accountability.
LWN.netA·90
Discipline · 90/100
Deep technical accuracy + named bylines + per-article rigor + corrections public.
Signals behind the Discipline score
Ars Technica
- Named bylinesAuthor + email + bio on every article.
LWN.net
- Technical depthStrong technical-accuracy reputation in Linux community.
Other dimensions for Ars Technica vs LWN.net
Other Discipline comparisons
Wikipedia (English) vs Encyclopædia BritannicaThe New York Times vs The Washington PostAssociated Press vs ReutersFinancial Times vs The Wall Street JournalNature vs ScienceNew England Journal of Medicine vs The LancetarXiv vs PubMedDOI (CrossRef Resolver) vs Semantic ScholarForeign Affairs vs The EconomistBBC News vs The GuardianAl Jazeera English vs BBC NewsBBC News vs NPR